- Atiqah Maisarah
The appointment of a Judicial Manager marks a total transformation in the governance of a distressed company. Under Section 414 of the Companies Act 2016, once an order is issued, all functions and powers previously held by the Board of Directors are immediately vacated and vested in the manager. This divestment of power is a fundamental pillar of the framework, ensuring that the management of the company is transferred from the hands of those who may have contributed to the financial crisis into the hands of an independent and qualified professional.
The Judicial Manager acts as an officer of the Court and a fiduciary to the body of creditors as a whole. According to the Ninth Schedule of the Companies Act 2016, the manager is granted extensive powers to manage the affairs, business, and property of the company. These powers include the authority to take possession of assets, dispose of property, and enter into transactions necessary for the rescue. Being an independent personal, they can often negotiate with banks and suppliers more effectively than the directors, who may have already lost the confidence of the company’s financial partners.
During the Interim Period, which is the time between the filing of the application and the Court’s final disposal, the directors generally maintain their authority to conduct affairs in the ordinary course of business. However, once Judicial Management Order is granted, it shall effectively ends the directors’ executive control. Any execution of legal instruments, including property transfers or loan documents, must then be performed by the Judicial Manager. This creates a clear line of demarcation, ensuring that the rescue plan is executed without interference or potential conflicts of interest from the previous management.
The manager’s duties are broadly divided into two main categories: the management of the company’s business and the formulation of a restructuring proposal. Under Section 414(1) and (2), the manager is tasked with overseeing the voting, approval, and enforcement of a proposed scheme. While the manager runs the company’s day to day operations to maintain value, their primary focus is the big picture strategy of designing a financial plan that will eventually lead to the discharge of the order once the company is stabilized and the creditors’ debts are restructured.
The rationale for taking the keys away is ultimately about accountability. By making the Judicial Manager the sole authorized signatory, the Act provides a safeguard against the dissipation of assets during the rescue period. It ensures that every ringgit spent or asset sold is documented and aligned with the Court ordered objectives. While directors may remain in an advisory capacity if requested, the legal and operational control remains firmly with the manager until the Court orders otherwise or the rescue mission is completed.
General Disputes Resolution and Appellate Division
General Disputes Resolution and Appellate Division
General Disputes Resolution and Appellate Division
General Disputes Resolution and Appellate Division
This article is prepared and published by
Messrs. Ben Lee & Sharen
Advocates & Solicitors


